Learn about a blog that uses an evidence-based debate approach to emergency medicine education.
Greatest Hits 2011
December 29, 2011 By 15 Comments
Goodbye 2011! We recap the year that was for LITFL and present to you the best LITFL posts of the year.
Toxicology Social Media Shout Outs
December 15, 2011 By 5 Comments
The LITFL team gives a shout out to three great new toxicology resources: Twin Cities Toxicology, ToxTals and the ACMT podcast.
The LITFL Review 033
August 29, 2011 By 1 Comment
The LITFL Review is your regular and reliable source for the highest highlights, sneakiest sneak peaks and loudest shout-outs from the webbed world of emergency medicine and critical care.
The LITFL Review 032
August 22, 2011 By 2 Comments
The LITFL Review is your regular and reliable source for the highest highlights, sneakiest sneak peaks and loudest shout-outs from the webbed world of emergency medicine and critical care.
Brilliant Broome Docs
June 12, 2011 By 1 Comment
I’ve always thought ‘GP proceduralist’ is a very understated term for people who should really be considered the ‘MacGyvers of medicine’. GP proceduralists in remote Australia are what most doctors were maybe eighty years ago — and what most of us dreamed of being when we went into medical school: having a baby? They’ll deliver [...]
Emergency Medicine Updates
March 10, 2011 By 1 Comment
Reuben Strayer’s blog Emergency Medicine Updates gets a good ‘ole fashioned LITFL shout out. Some awesome links to click in this one.
UCEM to Leave Sinking Ship?
February 2, 2011 By 8 Comments
Is the Utopian College of Emergency for Medicine about to ditch ‘Life in the Fast Lane’ and take their online presence elsewhere? Find out here…
Emergency Medicine Tweducation
January 11, 2011 By 1 Comment
Twitter is a great tool to keeping your finger on the emergency medicine pulse. In this video Iain Beardsell shows you how it all works.
Time to publish then filter?
January 5, 2011 By Leave a Comment
An editorial in the BMJ by Schriger and Altman highlights the failings of the peer review process and the need for effective post-publication peer review.
