Who Was and What is

To truly define the domain of eponymous prolixity we have to understand the ‘Who‘ aspect of naming convention…

These ‘Who’s’ we speak of areon the whole people (medicine being a tiny bit scientifically based) that really existed (take note Horton…). In fact the Honorable names within the Eponymictionary are often associated with noted scientists or physicians of the time. These are not ‘made-up’ names; ancient orthographic hallows or personifications designed to bemuse or confuse – these people really existed

I like to think of these ‘Who’s’ as the ‘definable anti-prolix‘ of modern medicine. Something Gen Y and Gen Z should consider before repudiating historical context to a period of quiescence

Scientists, Doctors and Researchers

Other people with stuff named after them

“It helps a man immensely to be a bit of a hero-worshipper, and the stories of the lives of the masters of medicine do much to stimulate our ambition and rouse our sympathies”- Sir William Osler, from Chauvanism in Medicine, in Aequanimitas.

Print Friendly

Speak Your Mind

*

About Mike Cadogan

Emergency physician with a passion for medical informatics and medical education. Co-founder of HealthEngine, iMeducate, and the GMEP. He writes more eclectically on the web as @sandnsurf | + Mike Cadogan | Contact