Look at this ECG:
There are three main diagnostic possibilities:
- VT
- SVT with aberrant conduction due to bundle branch block
- SVT with aberrant conduction due to the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
The most important distinction is whether the rhythm is ventricular (VT) or supraventricular (SVT with aberrancy), as this will significantly influence how you manage the patient. SVTs usually respond well to AV-nodal blocking drugs, whereas patients with VT may suffer precipitous haemodynamic deterioration if erroneously administered an AV-nodal blocking agent.
Unfortunately, the electrocardiographic differentiation of VT from SVT with aberrancy is not always possible.
There are several electrocardiographic features that increase the likelihood of VT:
- Absence of typical RBBB or LBBB morphology
- Extreme axis deviation (“northwest axis”) – QRS is positive in aVR and negative in I + aVF.
- Very broad complexes (>160ms)
- AV dissociation (P and QRS complexes at different rates)
- Capture beats — occur when the sinoatrial node transiently ‘captures’ the ventricles, in the midst of AV dissociation, to produce a QRS complex of normal duration.
- Fusion beats — occur when a sinus and ventricular beat coincides to produce a hybrid complex.
- Positive or negative concordance throughout the chest leads, i.e. leads V1-6 show entirely positive (R) or entirely negative (QS) complexes, with no RS complexes seen.
- Brugada’s sign – The distance from the onset of the QRS complex to the nadir of the S-wave is > 100ms
- Josephson’s sign – Notching near the nadir of the S-wave
- RSR’ complexes with a taller left rabbit ear. This is the most specific finding in favour of VT. This is in contrast to RBBB, where the right rabbit ear is taller.
Examples of these ECG features are shown below:

Fusion beats - the first of the narrower complexes is a fusion beat (the next two are capture beats)
The likelihood of VT is also increased with:
- Age > 35 (positive predictive value of 85%)
- Structural heart disease
- Ischaemic heart disease
- Previous MI
- Congestive heart failure
- Cardiomyopathy
- Family history of sudden cardiac death (suggesting conditions such as HOCM, congenital long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome or arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia that are associated with episodes of VT)
The likelihood of SVT with aberrancy is increased if:
- Previous ECGs show a bundle branch block pattern with identical morphology to the broad complex tachycardia.
- Previous ECGs show evidence of WPW (short PR < 120ms, broad QRS, delta wave).
- The patient has a history of paroxysmal tachycardias that have been successfully terminated with adenosine or vagal manoeuvres.
Advanced Tips for Diagnosing VT — The Brugada Criteria
- For difficult cases, the Brugada algorithm can be used to distinguish between VT and SVT with aberrancy.
- The algorithm is followed from top to bottom — if any of the criteria are satisfied then VT is diagnosed.
1. Absence of an RS complex in all precordial leads
- This is essentially the same as having positive or negative concordance.
- If all the precordial leads consist of either monophasic R or S waves then VT is diagnosed.
- If there are any RS complexes present in V1-6 –> move on to the next step of the algorithm.
2. RS interval > 100ms in one precordial lead
- If RS complexes are present in V1-6 then the RS interval is measured.
- This is the time from the onset of the R wave to the nadir of the S wave.
- If the RS interval is > 100 ms –> VT is diagnosed.
- If the RS interval is < 100 ms –> move on to step 3.
3. AV dissociation
- The ECG is scrutinised for hidden P waves; these are often superimposed on the QRS complexes and may be difficult to see.
- If P waves are present at a different rate to the QRS complexes –> AV dissociation is present and VT is diagnosed.
- If no evidence of AV dissociation can be seen –> go to step 4.

AV dissociation: P waves can be spotted in between QRS complexes (circled) and superimposed upon the T wave causing a peaked appearance (arrow)
4. Morphological Criteria for VT
Leads V1-2 and V6 are assessed for characteristic features of VT. There are two sets of morphological criteria depending on the appearance of the QRS complex in V1:
- If there is a dominant R wave in V1 –> see criteria for RBBB-like morphology.
- If there is a dominant S wave in V1 –> see criteria for LBBB-like morphology.
Broad complex tachycardia with RBBB morphology
Appearance in V1-2
With a positive R wave in V1, three patterns are indicative of VT:
- Smooth monophasic R wave
- Notched downslope to the R wave — the taller left rabbit ear (= Marriott’s sign)
- A qR complex (small Q wave, tall R wave) in V1
In contrast, an RSR’ pattern is suggestive of SVT with RBBB.
Appearance in V6
In V6, the following patterns are consistent with VT:
- QS complex – a completely negative complex with no R wave (= strongly suggestive of VT).
- R/S ratio < 1 – small R wave, deep S wave (indicates VT only if LAD is also present).
Broad complex tachycardia with LBBB morphology
Appearance in V1-2
With a dominant S wave in V1, the following three features are diagnostic of VT:
- Initial R wave > 30-40 ms duration.
- Notching or slurring of the S wave (Josephson’s sign).
- RS interval (time from R wave onset to S wave nadir) > 60-70 ms.
Appearance in V6
With a LBBB-like pattern, the presence of Q waves in V6 is indicative of VT. There are two possible patterns:
- QS waves in V6 (as with RBBB-like patterns, this finding is very specific for VT).
- qR pattern = small Q wave, large R wave.
Conversely, SVT with LBBB is associated with absent Q waves in V6.
More Advanced Tips — The Vereckei Algorithm
There is some overlap between the Vereckei and Brugada algorithms, but one of the most useful tips from the Vereckei algorithm is to examine the QRS complex in lead aVR.
- A dominant initial R wave in aVR is indicative of VT.
- A dominant terminal R’ wave in aVR (i.e. following a Q/S wave) is more likely SVT with aberrancy — this pattern is most commonly seen in tricyclic poisoning.
Other diagnostic algorithms
Flow charts for the other three commonly used diagnostic algorithms (ACC, Ultra-simple Brugada, Vereckei ) can be found here.
Conclusions
- Most of the published criteria have high specificities but very low sensitivities (e.g. 20-50%) for diagnosing VT.
- This means that even in the absence of diagnostic features for VT, there is no way to be 100% certain that the rhythm is SVT with aberrancy…
- If in doubt, treat as VT!
Broad Complex Tachycardia Quiz
Test your skills with these broad complex rhythms…
Example 1
AV-nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT) with LBBB
- Typical LBBB morphology.
- No positive Brugada criteria.
- This patient had LBBB with identical morphology on their previous ECGs.
Read more about AVNRT here.
Read more about LBBB here.
Example 2
- This ECG is a difficult one!
- Although there is a broad complex tachycardia (HR > 100, QRS > 120), the appearance in V1 is more suggestive of SVT with aberrancy, given that the the complexes are not that broad (< 160 ms) and the right rabbit ear is taller than the left.
- However, on closer inspection there are signs of AV dissociation, with superimposed P waves visible in V1.
- Also, the presence of a northwest axis and an R/S ratio < 1 in V6 (tiny R wave, deep S wave) indicate that this is VT.
- This patient had a completely different QRS axis and morphology on his baseline ECG.
Read more about monomorphic VT here.
Example 3
Sinus tachycardia with incomplete RBBB:
- P waves are visible before each QRS complex.
- There is a typical RBBB morphology with a RSR’ complex in V1 and wide S wave in the lateral leads I, V5-6.
- In contrast to the previous example, there is a dominant R wave in V6 (RS ratio > 1), which is much more typical of RBBB.
- QRS complexes are only slightly prolonged (110ms), making this an incomplete RBBB.
- Q waves and T-wave inversions in III and aVF suggest prior inferior infarction.
Read more about RBBB here.
Example 4
Tricyclic antidepressant toxicity:
- QRS complexes are very broad (~200ms) — however, unlike with VT most of the broadening is in the terminal portion of the QRS (this can be best appreciated in leads V3-V6 where narrow R waves are followed by massively broad and deep S waves).
- There are no positive Brugada criteria — in particular, the RS interval is < 100 ms.
- No P waves can be seen.
The characteristic features of TCA toxicity are:
- Tachycardia — this is often a sinus tachycardia with a grossly prolonged PR interval, such that the P wave is hidden in the previous T wave or QRS complex; may be difficult to differentiate from junctional tachycardia with aberrant conduction.
- Broad QRS complexes.
- Right axis deviation of the terminal QRS — positive R’ wave in aVR, deep S wave in lead I.
Read more about TCA toxicity here.
Example 5
The patient is 5 years old.
Antidromic atrioventricular re-entry tachycardia (AVRT) due to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome:
- This is the one rhythm that may be impossible to distinguish from VT!
- In this case the main clue is the history — more than 95% of broad complex tachycardias in children are SVT with aberrancy.
Read more about paediatric dysrhythmias here.
Read more about WPW here.
Example 6
Rapid ventricular paced rhythm (e.g. pacemaker-mediated tachycardia)
- There are obvious pacing spikes before each QRS complex.
- Ventricular paced rhythms have features in common with other ventricular rhythms — in this case the ECG demonstrates negative concordance in V1-6, initial R wave > 40ms in V1, RS interval > 70 ms in V1, QS complex in V6.
- Remember that the pacing spikes may not always be as obvious as this!
Read more about pacemaker dysfunctions here.
Finally…
For those of you wondering what the ECG at the top of the page is…. it is an example of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia - a type of VT!
- Read a detailed review article on VT versus SVT by ECG guru Prof Hein Wellens (of eponymous syndrome fame!).
- See some great ECG examples of ventricular tachycardia from the LITFL ECG library.
Related Topics
Read more about the different types of VT by following these links:
- Monomorphic VT
- Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Tachycardia
- Polymorphic VT / Torsades De Pointes
- Fasicular Tachycardia
- Bidirectional VT
- Ventricular Flutter
- ECG Exigency 004 - a case of broad complex tachycardia.
Author Credits
Further Reading
- ECG BASICS — Waves, Intervals, Segments and Clinical Interpretation
- ECG CLINICAL CASES — Your favourite ECG’s placed in clinical context with a challenging Q&A approach
- ECG and Cardiology Eponymous Syndromes — Cheats guide to eponymous emancipation
- ECG Exam Template — a framework for the FACEM part 2 exam.
- ECG Reference Sites on the WEB — the best of the rest
References
- Alzand BS, Crijns HJ. Diagnostic criteria of broad QRS complex tachycardia: decades of evolution. Europace. 2011 Apr;13(4):465-72. Epub 2010 Dec 3. Review. PubMed PMID: 21131372.
- Chan TC, Brady WJ, Harrigan RA, Ornato JP, Rosen P. ECG in Emergency Medicine and Acute Care. Elsevier Mosby 2005.
- Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice. 6th Edition. Saunders Elsevier 2008.
- Wagner, GS. Marriott’s Practical Electrocardiography (11th edition), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2007.
- Wellens HJ. Electrophysiology: Ventricular tachycardia: diagnosis of broad QRS complex tachycardia. Heart. 2001 Nov;86(5):579-85. Review. PubMed PMID: 11602560; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1729977. Full text.













































Thanks this is very helpful. This remains a diagnostic dilemma particularly in the population who are at risk of both VF and SVT. I shall use this rubric for my residents when they want to know how to differentiate. Thanks again…
Excellent teaching module, very brief, precise and to the point. Thank you and keep up the good work !
Good on u, that is handy
Thank you!
You have put it simple the differences between VT & SVT with aberrancy. I now fully understand and that I will teach the same to the Residents and Medical students.
A very useful site!
Laki
You could add Vereckei or Sasaki’s criteria to the list: aVR the little lead that could! An initial R-wave in aVR is a very specific finding for VT.
Hey Chris,
Thanks for your comments. Please excuse my very late reply!
The Vereckei sign is a very useful tip — have added it to the page!
Cheers!
Ed
Thanks alot,,,very very useful,,,,,thanks again
nice module very very very good job
Great EKG’s and commentary, it also makes it easier when you consider the patient’s status -- if they are unstable it’s makes the management choice a lot easier given it’s the same. Shock’em!
this is the best ECG site that i have come across sofar
Cheers!
Chris
simply tnx alot
Thanks great article
i read same article form this link
http://medicthriller.blogspot.in/2012/05/vt-versus-svt-with-aberrancy.html?spref=fb
but author on that is not mentioned
excellent work!
Dr. Burns,
Thank you! This is very helpful.
Still confused. One of your examples shows lead V6 in SVT with aberrancy and a LBBB pattern. If you apply Brugada rules here, the R to S nadir is well over 100ms, which i s supposed to have a very high specificity for VT.