Friday Feynman Inspiration 002

Feynmann copy

The Feynman Series is a companion project with The Sagan Series in hopes to promote scientific education and scientific literacy in the general population.

The Storm is here!

The amazing animated version of Tim Minchin’s amazing 9 minute beat poem, Storm, can now be seen on the web. Right here even!

Path140

MJ

Is it possible to summarise all of human pathology into 140 characters or less? Michelle Johnston (aka @Eleytherius) thinks so…

Heart attack equipoise

Thumb_Emergency

Musings on the point of equipoise for investigating and discharging chest pain patients in light of a new paper in the Lancet describing a rapid rule-out protocol for acute coronary syndromes (the ASPECT trial).

The Art of Infarct Localisation

ECG anatomy The Art of Infarct Localisation

Brilliant images illustrating the art of myocardial infarct localisation by ECG interpretation.

Funtabulously Frivolous Friday Five 049

LITFL yfront thumb 150

Studies show that 73.2% of people start to develop FFFF withdrawal symptoms 168 hours after receiving the previous dose. Thus it would be inhumane to delay any longer… Bring on the funtabulous frivolity!

A Stand Against Big Pharma

Thumb_Emergency

Jelinek and Brown announce that Emergency Medicine Australasia is taking a stand against drug company advertising. The LITFL team applauds!

Placebo Weirdness

placebo

Check out @ProfessorFunk’s kinetic typography take on the utter weirdness of placebos, based on information from @BenGoldacre’s superlative book, Bad Science.

The Wisdom of Crowd Review

LITFL Review 150

Almost immediately after finishing ‘Time to publish then filter?’ – a post that highlighted a recent editorial in the BMJ outlining the need for an effective system of post-publication peer review — I came across this in the Annals of Emergency Medicine: Millard WB. The Wisdom of Crowds, the Madness of Crowds: Rethinking Peer Review [...]

Time to publish then filter?

LITFL shoes

An editorial in the BMJ by Schriger and Altman highlights the failings of the peer review process and the need for effective post-publication peer review.